20 Songs with Really Bad Grammar
As the son of an English professor and librarian, and being a journalism major, I’m, well, sensitive to proper grammar. I’ve learned to bite my tongue whenever someone says “Between he and I” or “irregardless,” although I have been known to correct signs in grocery stores and restaurants. It’s an affliction, I’ll admit.
Recently, a friend of mine reminded me of how I used to make fun of Paula Abdul’s “Opposites Attract,” in which every verse begins with the words “It ain’t.” That got me thinking about other grammar violations in songs.
There are a lot. So many, in fact, that I’ve had to limit my search to only the worst offenders. Here they are, grouped by type of grammar felony.
Improper use of the objective pronoun
- Bryan Adams, “Run to You” – “But that’d change if she ever found out about you and I.” Simple rule here, folks. Take out the “you and” and see if the sentence makes sense. Sorry, Bryan. It’s supposed to be “you and me.” I’ll give you a break because you’re Canadian.
- Queen, “Good Old Fashioned Lover Boy” – “I’d like for you and I to go romancing.” D’oh! I thought only bad artists committed grammar violations! Freddie, no!
- Eric Carmen, “Hungry Eyes” – “I feel the magic between you and I.” “I” doesn’t even rhyme with “eyes,” and it’s almost the same word!
- Paula Cole, “I Don’t Want to Wait” – “So open up your morning light /And say a little prayer for I.” Good Lord. She followed the above rule and still screwed it up. And again, the verses don’t rhyme. “What about “Have a cup of morning tea / And say a little prayer for me?” Makes about as much sense and is grammatically correct.
Misspelled lyrics
- Fergie, “Fergalicious” – “T to the A to the S-T-E -Y / Girl, you’re tasty.” Thanks, Fergie and will.i.am, a whole generation of kids will now misspell “tasty,” and for that matter, “William.” But what do you expect from two of the people who gave us the song that this blog is named after?
Lie vs. Lay
I learned this one from Mrs. Jenkins’ seventh grade English class. “Lie” is for lying down, to make oneself horizontal on a surface; it does not carry an object. “Lay” requires an object, i.e., you’re laying something on a table. Easy enough, right? Apparently not:
- Eric Clapton, “Lay Down Sally”
- Bob Dylan, “Lay Lady Lay.” And he’s supposed to be a poet.
- Bonnie Raitt, “I Can’t Make You Love Me.” “Lay down with me, tell me no lies.” Maybe she didn’t want to have the word “lie” in two consecutive verses. Still no excuse.
- Snow Patrol, “Chasing Cars.” Snow Patrol committed the violation twice, then realized it and used it correctly on the third verse: “If I lay here / If I just lay here / Would you lie with me and just forget the world?” Half-credit for the correction.
Making up words to complete a rhyme
- Gwen Stefani, “Bubble Pop Electric” – “I’m restless, can’t you see I try my bestest.” You didn’t try hard enough, Gwen.
- Justin Timberlake, “What Goes Around” – “When you cheated girl, my heart bleeded girl.” I know, Justin, it seems like the past tense of “bleed” should be “bleeded,” but it’s not. English is weird. Hey, I just had this conversation with my 4-year-old the other day…
- Trace Adkins, “Honky Tonk Badonkadonk” – I hate to mention a country song, because that opens up a whole new realm of grammar mistakes. But “badonkadonk”? Really?
Special subcategory: Just making up words
- Young Rant/Shorty B, “Can We Conversate” / Case, “Conversate” – When did “conversate” become a word? I guess instead of admiring someone, we’ll soon “admirate” someone. Or instead of authorizing something, we’ll “authorizate” it.
Redundant redundancy
- Everclear, ”I Will Buy You a New Life” - ”I will buy you a new car, perfect, shiny and new.” Yes, but will it be new?
Subject-verb agreement
- The Police, “Every Little Thing She Does Is Magic” – “Everything she do just turns me on.” Perhaps Sting is keeping in line with the whole reggae/ska feel of the Police’s early music. But using “does” here really wouldn’t hurt.
- Timbaland, “The Way I Are” – “Can you handle me the way I are?” Does anyone really talk like this?
The unexplainable
- Dan Fogelberg, “Stars” – “Far too many stars have fell on me.” For some reason I expected more from Fogelberg. Jeez, he even uses the word “fickle” in this song. How can you do that and get the past participle of “fall” wrong?
- Backstreet Boys, “I’ll Never Break Your Heart” – “As time goes by, you will get to know me a little more better.” Maybe if she spends more time with you, she’ll know you much more betterer. Then she’ll know you the betterest.
- Gwen Stefani, “Rich Girl” – “If I was a rich girl…” The rule here is the past subjunctive requires the plural form of the verb to be. That’s a tough rule, and Gwen may not have known that. But this is a remake of the Fiddler on the Roof song, “If I WERE a Rich Man.” So for some reason, she thought the original composers were wrong, and she, the grammar queen, would make the verse grammatically correct. Either that, or she has an evil plot to dumb down America. Or she’s kinda stupid. I mean, who else had two songs on this list?
Honorable Mention
Lee Greenwood, “God Bless the U.S.A” – “I’m proud to be an American, where at least I know I’m free.” At first glance, this seems okay. But Regina over at AmIRight.com exposes the grammar offense. Her analysis is spot-on:
While the singer’s patriotic sentiments are touching, the relationship of dependent and independent clauses here just doesn’t work. That is because the connector, “where”, is a place-referent connector and therefore needs an antecedent of place in the independent clause. But there is no antecedent of place. That is to say, “I’m proud to be in America, Where at least I know I’m free” would work grammatically, but the actual lines here don’t, since “an American” does not imply a place, but is followed by “where”, which needs to refer back to a place.
That’s so snobby. I love it.
Finally, I’d like to clear up a misconception about what continually comes up as a grammar felony: Paul McCartney and Wings’ “Live and Let Die.” Many have interpreted the lyrics at the beginning of the song as “But if this ever-changing world in which we live in / makes you give in and cry,” and note the two “in”s as a grammar faux pas.
But the correct words could also be: “But if this ever-changing world in which we’re livin’.” So not only would McCartney avoid a grammar felony, but he would also manage to avoid ending his sentence in a preposition. Bravo, Paul!
Coming up next, our grand prize winner. I give you one of the worst offenders of the English language I’ve ever seen. (Hint: Her name rhymes with fiancé.)


May 26th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Just wanted to make little comment about the song, “The Way I Are”, yes, people talk like this all the time. Teaching kindergarten this year, it seemed like I was correcting grammar as often as I was redirecting behavior. You would be horrified to hear some of what I hear every day. The sad thing is, as long as musicians continue butchering the English language, children are going to continue thinking that’s the way they are supposed to talk.
May 26th, 2009 at 9:26 pm
I weep for our future, Laurie.
May 27th, 2009 at 7:43 am
This are a really good post. I can’t imagine a gooder one. It’s the bestest post I’ve ever sawn.
May 27th, 2009 at 9:13 am
Thanks, Beyonce!
May 28th, 2009 at 2:00 pm
[...] rock, which is one of the things I dig about them. Over at My Hmphs, you can explore the anti-Dans: 20 songs with really bad grammar and what might be the single most illiterate song in the history of [...]
May 29th, 2009 at 3:33 am
Brilliant post. And educational. I totally missed that will.i.am is supposed to be punctuation-raped version of William. I presumed it was perhaps a statement of intent referring to s specific time in the very early hours of a new day.
May 31st, 2009 at 9:30 pm
Love it! And related to the place-referent connector discussion, I always wince when I hear the Kinks’ “All Day and All of the Night” for this reason: “the only time I feel alright is by your side.” “By your side” is a place, not a time. D’OH!
June 6th, 2009 at 1:03 pm
Ooh, that’s a nice one!
June 13th, 2009 at 2:31 pm
Dylan should win for worst use of grammar for his misuse of “whom” in the Immigrant Song:
Whom eats but is not satisfied
Whom hears but does not see
He’s great anyway, though.
June 13th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
Titles:
Me and Julio Down By the Schoolyard, Paul Simon (Julio and I)
All Shook Up, Elvis (Shaken)
Who Do You Love, George Thoroughgood (Whom)
How about lyrics:
“If I was king for a day” Thompson Twins (were)
“… I lay down and die.” Gloria Gaynor (lie)
“What if God was one of us…” Joan Osbourne (were)
June 13th, 2009 at 4:22 pm
How could you over look: “Is you is or is you ain’t my baby?”
June 13th, 2009 at 5:30 pm
Um your wrong about the first couple of songs describing lyrics using “you and I”. In older English vocabulary times, using “I” was the proper term to use after “you and”…, it’s only been recent that “me” has been referred to in the same way. Thus now both are recognized in sentences in similar regards, so no F-up there.
And conversate is a definition. Don’t like it either.
But everything else was right and funny as heck… especially Gwen hehe.
June 14th, 2009 at 11:22 am
Thanks for the comment! I’ve never seen “you and I” used as a compound object, though. I am basing my analysis on the Oxford Dictionary, which says, “It’s right to say ‘between you and me’, and wrong to say ‘between you and I’. This is because a preposition such as ‘between’ should be followed by an object pronoun such as ‘me’, ‘him’, ‘her’, and ‘us’ rather than a subject pronoun such as ‘I’, ‘he’, ’she’, and ‘we’.” See http://www.askoxford.com/betterwriting/classicerrors/grammartips/iorme?view=uk.
Now I sound like a real nerd.
June 14th, 2009 at 11:23 am
D’oh! I think I had blocked the Joan Osborne song out of my head permanently.
June 14th, 2009 at 11:24 am
Yeah, that one’s pretty bad. It also earns the bad grammar trifecta that Beyonce received.
July 15th, 2009 at 10:35 pm
What about double negatives? There are so many examples!
“We don’t need no education” – Pink Floyd (Clearly they do – should be “We don’t need ANY education”)
“I can’t get no satisfaction” – again, should be “any”, maybe he’ll get some now.
July 17th, 2009 at 8:45 am
One song that really irritates me is Big Girls Don’t Cry by Fergie:
“And I’m gonna miss you like a child misses their blanket”
Personally, I really miss the pronoun/antecedent agreement that should be happening in these lyrics!
July 17th, 2009 at 9:16 am
@James Wood: I could do a whole series on double negatives!
@Cindy: Double points for it being a Fergie song.
August 11th, 2009 at 8:58 pm
Hey, may be snobby, but “which needs to refer back to a place” is grammatically incorrect as well. ; )
October 13th, 2009 at 1:52 pm
[...] can read the full article here. Enjoy! [...]
October 15th, 2009 at 4:17 pm
10 points to WorkInProgress. -2 for Gary (“Who”). Nice job, V.
November 25th, 2009 at 7:16 pm
I want to blame the songwriter, but when you’re getting paid as much as some of these artists- a little prewriting/editing wouldn’t hurt.
February 10th, 2010 at 7:34 pm
I think you may be wrong on the Chasing Cars example. In hypothetical sentences, you always you the past tense verb in the “if” section, and the regular form in the resultant clause. Lay is the past tense version of lie. “If I lay here, would you lie with me?” You can substitute another verb to show that it’s true. “If I were here, would you be here?” Were and be are the same word, just different tenses.
February 11th, 2010 at 1:10 am
So, Paul, you’re saying regarding the Chasing Cars example, that the lyrics are grammatically correct if the songwriter is saying, “If I lay an egg here, would you lie with me”?
March 1st, 2010 at 1:20 pm
Thanks for your efforts to stem the tide of grammatical anarchy. I fear that words no longer have any meaning; they are simply the vehicles for conveying feeling. No matter that no two people have the same reaction; feeling is all that matters.
Thinking?? You can’t be serious! Where did that ever get us?
March 12th, 2010 at 2:38 pm
Sorry, but I think some of this argument is flawed from the beginning. The problem is with the confusion between ‘grammar’ and ‘registers’ (formal, informal…). Just because some grammar forms are considered incorrect in formal English, it does not mean they are not correct in colloquial use – people just talk like this, and they always will. For example the “we don’t need no education” line – I think it works quite well in the context of the song – we don’t care about the double negative or any other rules from the school…