<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 5 Most Influential Artists of the 1970s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myhmphs.com/2008/08/the-5-most-influential-artists-of-the-1970s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myhmphs.com/2008/08/the-5-most-influential-artists-of-the-1970s/</link>
	<description>Searching for melody and meaning in a world filled with bad music.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: AppreciatorOfRock</title>
		<link>http://www.myhmphs.com/2008/08/the-5-most-influential-artists-of-the-1970s/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>AppreciatorOfRock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhmphs.com/?p=287#comment-307</guid>
		<description>NO BETTY DAVIS!!!...THE ORIGINAL DIVA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO BETTY DAVIS!!!&#8230;THE ORIGINAL DIVA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barely Awake In Frog Pajamas</title>
		<link>http://www.myhmphs.com/2008/08/the-5-most-influential-artists-of-the-1970s/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Barely Awake In Frog Pajamas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhmphs.com/?p=287#comment-289</guid>
		<description>One act I think should be in the mix for the '70s somewhere is Bob Marley &#38; The Wailers. I suppose that you could make the same argument that you did for Johnny Cash a few days ago - more a legend than an influence - but Marley did expose an entire generation to reggae music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One act I think should be in the mix for the &#8217;70s somewhere is Bob Marley &amp; The Wailers. I suppose that you could make the same argument that you did for Johnny Cash a few days ago - more a legend than an influence - but Marley did expose an entire generation to reggae music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.myhmphs.com/2008/08/the-5-most-influential-artists-of-the-1970s/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 03:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhmphs.com/?p=287#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Good post. Actually, Bruce is not among even my Top 10 favorite artists of the 1970s. But I still stand on my position that he, along with Tom Petty, gave birth to Heartland Rock (John Mellencamp, Steve Earle), which eventually morphed into Americana (John Hiatt, Jayhawks). And you could throw in The River in 1980 to sum up the decade - all in all, that's five solid albums that gave a base for Mellencamp, Bob Seger, and yes, John Cafferty to carry the sound on. The fact that the sound hasn't changed much is what gives Americana its familiarity and gives fans an alternative to whatever the flavor of the year is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. Actually, Bruce is not among even my Top 10 favorite artists of the 1970s. But I still stand on my position that he, along with Tom Petty, gave birth to Heartland Rock (John Mellencamp, Steve Earle), which eventually morphed into Americana (John Hiatt, Jayhawks). And you could throw in The River in 1980 to sum up the decade - all in all, that&#8217;s five solid albums that gave a base for Mellencamp, Bob Seger, and yes, John Cafferty to carry the sound on. The fact that the sound hasn&#8217;t changed much is what gives Americana its familiarity and gives fans an alternative to whatever the flavor of the year is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Altreuter</title>
		<link>http://www.myhmphs.com/2008/08/the-5-most-influential-artists-of-the-1970s/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Altreuter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhmphs.com/?p=287#comment-287</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with you about Bruce, at least if we are using the word "influential" in its ordinary sense.  A significant artist? Sure, absolutely, but really what his work represents is a synthesis of Phil Spector's sound, Bob Dylan's meter, and a few other elements.  Who has he influenced?  Thin Lizzy? Meatloaf? John Cafferty and the Beaver Brown Band?  Melissa Etheridge? Springsteen is sui generis, not influential.  He has not moved the form into a new direction, and with the exception of the artists I've mentioned, and (maybe) a few others, he has not inspired hoards of imitators. His sound and his work in general has not progressed in any meaningful or significant way in twenty years.  On top of that, how many great recordings did he produce over the period in question?  Granted, there was contract litigation that kept him out of the studio, but his 70's output consists of "Asbury Park" (solid debut, if derivative), "The Wild, the Innocent and the E Street Shuffle" (an advance, certainly), "Born to Run" (indisputably great), and "Darkness on the Edge of Town" (overwrought, but solid).  That's not really the track record of someone who is one of the top five "most influential", even if it the artist is one of your top five 70's favorites.

Better candidates for most influential might be George Clinton, Paul Simon (yes, really), Neil Young or Brian Eno.  

I'm not hatin' on the Boss-- I like him fine, but I think "influential" is the wrong list for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with you about Bruce, at least if we are using the word &#8220;influential&#8221; in its ordinary sense.  A significant artist? Sure, absolutely, but really what his work represents is a synthesis of Phil Spector&#8217;s sound, Bob Dylan&#8217;s meter, and a few other elements.  Who has he influenced?  Thin Lizzy? Meatloaf? John Cafferty and the Beaver Brown Band?  Melissa Etheridge? Springsteen is sui generis, not influential.  He has not moved the form into a new direction, and with the exception of the artists I&#8217;ve mentioned, and (maybe) a few others, he has not inspired hoards of imitators. His sound and his work in general has not progressed in any meaningful or significant way in twenty years.  On top of that, how many great recordings did he produce over the period in question?  Granted, there was contract litigation that kept him out of the studio, but his 70&#8217;s output consists of &#8220;Asbury Park&#8221; (solid debut, if derivative), &#8220;The Wild, the Innocent and the E Street Shuffle&#8221; (an advance, certainly), &#8220;Born to Run&#8221; (indisputably great), and &#8220;Darkness on the Edge of Town&#8221; (overwrought, but solid).  That&#8217;s not really the track record of someone who is one of the top five &#8220;most influential&#8221;, even if it the artist is one of your top five 70&#8217;s favorites.</p>
<p>Better candidates for most influential might be George Clinton, Paul Simon (yes, really), Neil Young or Brian Eno.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not hatin&#8217; on the Boss&#8211; I like him fine, but I think &#8220;influential&#8221; is the wrong list for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Led Zeppelin News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The 5 Most Influential Artists of the 1970s</title>
		<link>http://www.myhmphs.com/2008/08/the-5-most-influential-artists-of-the-1970s/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Led Zeppelin News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The 5 Most Influential Artists of the 1970s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myhmphs.com/?p=287#comment-281</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by peter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by peter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
